Decline in donations forecast for charities
A Texas company that analyzes economic indicators to guide nonprofits in raising money predicts those in Pennsylvania will have the worst time nationwide getting donations this year.
A recent report from the Atlas of Giving in Dallas predicts donations in the state will decline from $17.44 billion in 2012 to $17 billion in 2013.
Nationwide, the company predicts a slight increase in contributions, from $369.2 billion to $375.1 billion.
Atlas compiles data about more than two dozen factors, including unemployment rates, home sales, consumer confidence gauges and population changes. More than 6,000 subscribers, mostly nonprofit groups, get its monthly reports.
The company predicts that donations in the Pittsburgh metro area — Allegheny, Washington, Butler, Westmoreland, Beaver, Armstrong and Fayette counties — will drop about 2.9 percent, from $3.5 billion last year to $3.4 billion this year.
“There is a market correction expected nationally that will have an impact on charitable giving numbers, nationally and in Pennsylvania,” Atlas CEO Rob Mitchell said.
Some nonprofit administrators say they recognize that there are roadblocks to giving, but others say they expect to find continued generosity.
“I don't know how much weight I put on predictions,” said Carey Scheide Miller, the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy's senior director for development.
“Many people are generous, and we hope to find the people that are.”
Buoyed by strong foundation support, the conservancy's giving grew 47 percent last year, from $7.2 million in 2011 to $10.6 million in 2012.
Mitchell said environmental charities, such as the conservancy, are the least affected by unemployment because their donors tend to be educated and affluent.
The forecast would not affect all sectors of charity equally, he said.
For example, charities that rely more on individuals, such as churches, likely will feel the brunt more because such giving is susceptible to unemployment.
Without specifying an amount, Patrick M. Joyce, director of stewardship for the Pittsburgh Catholic Diocese, said giving last fiscal year was “relatively flat-lined” compared with fiscal 2010.
But he expressed confidence about this year: “I don't say it's a piece of cake, but if we focus the message on mission and impact, I'm absolutely confident that our parishes and diocese will do better in 2013.”
The Atlas findings mirror the national 2013 State of Philanthropy study conducted on behalf of Dunham+Company, a fundraising consulting firm in Dallas. That study found that, although Americans feel more stable about their economic situations, 27 percent of donors said they will give less this year than last. That's twice the number who said in 2012 they would give less than in 2011, and it's the lowest level of donor confidence since 2008.
The predictions are released as many nonprofits struggle to absorb cutbacks in state and federal grants. Many need to increase services for clients hampered by the economy.
“It's a double whammy,” said Joseph Geiger, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of Nonprofit Organizations in Harrisburg.
He said gridlock in Washington and Harrisburg over economic issues might compound the uncertainty that tends to decrease giving.
The Atlas report on Pennsylvania reverses the previous year's trend.
Charitable giving in the state rose last year by about 8.3 percent, from $16.1 billion in 2011 to $17.44 billion in 2012, Atlas found. That was the second highest increase in the nation.
Mitchell said that when he saw a downward forecast for Pennsylvania this year, he thought it was a mistake.
“I was stunned because Pennsylvania, as a state for charitable giving, has been a pack leader for a couple years,” he said.
Bill Zlatos is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7828 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Owner of Strip District nightclub Ivy agrees to close after shooting
- Artist born without arms, legs gives Hampton students peek into her world
- 10th DUI earns Uptown man 1st prison sentence
- Fired Plum officer won’t get job back
- Lawrenceville man charged with rape, child pornography and 27 other sexual offenses
- Wolf’s education proposal gets mixed reviews
- Bangladeshis to speak at Pitt in program against sweatshops
- Trial of bar owner accused of shooting cyclist in Allentown begins
- McKees Rocks father allegedly wanted to kill unborn
- Newsmaker: Lori E. McMaster
- McCandless mortgage broker company president charged with bank fraud conspiracy