Share This Page

Mergers a touchy topic for communities across Pa.

| Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Rev. Keith Hornung shovels snow along Main Street in West Alexander, Washington County on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Hornung has been the pastor with the West Alexander Presbyterian Church for five years. Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
The Rev. Keith Hornung shovels snow on the sidewalk to the community gazebo on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013, along Main Street in West Alexander, Washington County. Hornung has been the pastor with the West Alexander Presbyterian Church for five years. Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
A tractor clears snow along South Liberty in West Alexander in Washington County on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
The Rev. Keith Hornung waves at a passing motorist on Main Street in West Alexander, Washington County on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
The Rev. Keith Hornung, pastor of West Alexander Presbyterian Church, walks along Main Street in West Alexander, Washington County on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
A view of Fallston Borough in Beaver County on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Fallston Mayor Livio Pagani, 71, stands outside the Fallston Borough Municipal Building, a former school, on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Pagani disagrees with a proposed merger of Fallston with neighboring Patterson Township and vetoed council's decision to proceed with it. Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Fire department trophies line a display case at the Fallston Borough Municipal Building, a former school, on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Mayor Livio Pagani, 71, stands inside the Fallston Borough Municipal Building, a former school, on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Pagani says he has lived in Fallston for 65 years and has been mayor for 29 years. Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Bill Koble, 72, who says he has lived in Fallston all his life, clears the sidewalks along the main street in the borough on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Koble said he opposes the proposal to merge with neighboring Patterson Township. 'It's a bad idea. I'm against it,' he said. 'They don't have nothin' to offer us.' Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Motorists crossing the bridge to Fallston Borough in Beaver County see an American flag mural on the side of Col-Fin Specialty Steel Corp. on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013. Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review

Two years ago, Fallston in Beaver County spent nearly half its $108,000 budget to repair one road.

Officials of the borough, population 266, began talking about a merger with neighboring Patterson, which provided police protection for Fallston. Officials in both communities thought a merger made good financial sense.

Mayor Livio Pagani did not. He vetoed council's decision to proceed.

“The borough's not broke,” said Pagani, 71, mayor for 29 years. “We have no financial problems.”

Council overrode his veto, and if voters in the municipalities approve a referendum in May, Fallston would become part of the township next year.

The merger would be the first in Pennsylvania since 2008.

Community leaders from tiny boroughs such as Fallston to cities such as Harrisburg are struggling with a cycle of shrinking populations and revenue, and few options other than tax increases to fund employee pension funds and fire, police and other services.

Pennsylvania is a state of big numbers — 67 counties containing 56 cities, 961 boroughs, 1,549 townships, 20,015 municipal authorities and one incorporated town, according to the state Department of Economic and Community Development.

About four of every 10 state residents — 4.6 million of its 12.7 million population — live in financially distressed municipalities, according to the Allegheny Conference on Economic Development.

Yet only 12 municipal mergers or consolidations have taken place since 1991, state records show. Voters rejected 16 mergers.

Brian Jensen, senior vice president of the Pennsylvania Economy League, doesn't foresee better days ahead.

“It's really bad for a lot of cities, and it's only going to get worse,” he said.

A hard sell

Consolidations, which establish another municipality, and mergers are a hard sell, said Michael Foreman, director of local government services for the Department of Community and Economic Development in Pittsburgh.

“This is a dilemma we're dealing with statewide,” he said.

One problem is finding an attractive match, he said, because most municipalities aren't willing to accept a poorer neighbor.

Officials in Hempfield, for example, say the township, which is a much larger and wealthier community than Jeannette, isn't likely to absorb the financially distressed city.

“I can speak for myself and for the board,” said Doug Weimer, chairman of Hempfield's supervisors. “We won't be initiating any discussions with Jeannette.”

Robert Strauss, professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University, said municipalities considering mergers must be willing to accept each other's debts — and that's often a deal-breaker.

“It's an oil-water issue,” he said.

Strauss said residents of Mt. Lebanon, which has a low municipal debt-per-capita ratio, likely wouldn't consider merging with Pittsburgh, which has a high ratio.

“It's just not going to happen,” he said. “The problem is getting the voters to decide over debt.”

Coal Center, a town just off the Mon-Fayette Expressway in Washington County with five streets and 126 residents, had a budget of $20,000 in 2005. Yet its voters rejected a proposal to merge with nearby California.

Although California voters overwhelmingly approved the merger, Coal Center residents rejected it by nine votes, 47 to 38. The only entity that would have retained the Coal Center name would have been the post office, officials said, and residents were reluctant to lose their local identity.

That year, Burgettstown voters approved a proposed merger with surrounding Smith Township. But township voters narrowly rejected it and told officials they didn't know enough about the potential economic impact.

When voters approve

The last merger approved was in 2008, when Donegal took in West Alexander, a one-street borough on the western edge of Washington County.

West Alexander faced a problem common to the 500 municipalities in the nine-county Western Pennsylvania region: trying to boost tax revenue amid a population decline.

Times were good in 1985 when its historic district was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. During that time, visitors browsed antique and gift shops in a commercial center of restored 19th-century homes.

Five years later, fire destroyed three businesses and damaged two others. The town never fully recovered.

It began discussing a merger with the township, and officials agreed to put it to voters.

“We put it out (to referendum), and it passed,” said David Ealy, chairman of the Donegal Board of Supervisors. “West Alexander was having a hard time making ends meet.”

West Alexander's 320 residents were paying 16 mills in property taxes. The borough was saddled with $3.2 million in debt as a result of building a sewage treatment plant to serve 129 homes. Board seats went vacant for a lack of volunteers.

After the merger, West Alexander's millage rate dropped to 9 mills, and the township took over the treatment plant debt.

“We were going to assume the debt anyhow,” because the plant also serves the township, Ealy said.

Protecting turf

The main obstacle to mergers is turf, said Greensburg Manager Sue Trout, who served on a Pennsylvania League of Municipalities and Cities task force in 2010 that recommended solutions for troubled communities. Trout helped to make recommendations for the 2010 report, “Core Communities in Crisis.”

Trout has witnessed it firsthand with the city, which borders Southwest Greensburg and South Greensburg boroughs. Each has a mayor, council and police and street departments.

“I don't see a merger happening. I see us sharing services,” Trout said. “Quite frankly, there are too many egos involved.”

Trout said officials fear the loss of community identity.

That's the case in Beaver County, Pagani said.

“People in this municipality call me and say, ‘You're giving away our town,' ” he said. “I say, ‘Don't bark at me. I'm not giving it away. Council is giving it away.' ”

State Sen. John Wozniak, D-Johnstown, said weak leadership hurts cities and boroughs. Political considerations often outweigh financial ones, he said, and elected officials often refuse to make difficult decisions, such as employee furloughs.

“There's no question about it. If you want to save cities, you have to make some hard choices. You can't keep electing the same people and expect different results,” he said.

Mergers or consolidations would reduce the number of municipalities and stabilize distressed communities, said Wozniak, who formed a Third-Class City Caucus among lawmakers whose districts include financially troubled communities. The lawmakers will propose legislation such as pension reform and pledge to support each other's measures.

“You've got to rebuild the tax base. If you don't, it's a slow death spiral,” he said.

No state law allows a municipality to dissolve, Wozniak said. He plans to propose legislation to allow troubled cities and boroughs to disincorporate, forcing mergers without voters' consent.

“There's far too many local governments,” he said. “We can create government, but we can't uncreate government.”

Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at rgazarik@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.