Moon Area School Board gives approval on revised budget
In a special meeting on Monday, all nine members of the Moon Area School Board unanimously approved a revised preliminary budget of $64.4 million that slightly lowers a proposed tax rate and preserves the board's right to raise taxes if members believe they must for the 2013-14 school year.
The board's solicitor, Alfred Maiello, recommended the special meeting even though the board had rejected a budget proposal submitted by district administrators last week.
Maiello said the board had to meet because state Department of Education rules require approval of a proposed preliminary budget at least 85 days before the primary election, which is May 21.
The document approved this week calls for a property tax rate of 17.8 mills, under which a homeowner with a property assessed at $150,000 would pay $2,671 to the district. The administration had proposed a rate of 18.4 mills.
Business manager Alan Bennett said the higher rate was based on state Act One, which caps the amount of property tax increase the board can approve to 2 percent of the existing rate of 21.3 mills. It reflects expected increases in contributions to the state teachers' retirement fund.
District officials are required to reduce the millage rate downward because assessed property valuation in the district is expected to increase from the current $1.9 billion to $2.3 billion next year because of reassessments.
Daniel Work of Moon, one of about a dozen members of the Moon Area Education Support Professional Association who attended the meeting, asked the board if the revised budget proposal called for any furloughs.
Bennett said the document does not contain detailed line items and termed it “the very beginning” of the budget process.
Sandra Fischione Donovan is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Protest planned Monday at Plum Borough High School
- Forbes Avenue jeweler’s embedded sidewalk sign safely slides out to make way for Pittsburgh Playhouse project
- Senior at Pittsburgh’s CAPA school focuses spotlight on homeless students
- Poor infrastructure may hinder aid efforts in Nepal after earthquake
- Allegheny County Council will have new look
- District 7 candidates for Pittsburgh council vow to protect poorer communities
- Newsmakers: Danielle and Patrik McKain
- It’s business, but not as usual in Pittsburgh
- Plum school officials ignoring help, advocacy group’s chief says
- Burgess’ rivals for Pittsburgh council nomination owe money to government
- Garfield business reaches out to raise $90K for fixes