Share This Page

Newsmaker: Naomi Zigmond

| Saturday, March 16, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Submitted
The Council for Exceptional Children will award Naomi Zigmond, 71, of Squirrel Hill its Jeannette E. Fleischner Career Leadership Award at its annual convention and expo in April in San Antonio.

Noteworthy: The Council for Exceptional Children will award Zigmond the 2013 Jeannette E. Fleischner Career Leadership Award at its annual convention and expo in San Antonio in April. The award recognizes people who have advanced the field of learning disabilities.

Age: 71

Residence: Squirrel Hill

Family: Husband, Michael; son, Daniel; daughter, Leah; several grandchildren

Occupation: Emeritus distinguished professor of instruction and learning with the University of Pittsburgh's School of Education

Background: Zigmond recently led the development and implementation of a system assessing Pennsylvania students with cognitive disabilities. She is an advocate of including kids with disabilities in mainstream classes, and a critic of the “obsession of everybody getting the same thing” when it's clear that some kids need more help than others.

Education: Bachelor's degree in psychology from McGill University in Montreal; master's and doctorate degrees in learning disabilities from the School of Speech at Northwestern University

Quote: “We've been very worried that kids will feel bad if they're separated out, but I think they'll feel worse if they can't read.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.