Share This Page

Newsmaker: Ed McKaveney

| Tuesday, March 19, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Ed McKaveneyNoteworthy: Received the 2013 Withrow Chief Technology Officer Award from the Consortium for School Networking (CoSN)Age: 39Neighborhood: HamptonFamily: Wife, Amy; daughter, Maria, 2Education: Duquesne University, bachelor's degree in biology, 1995; masters degree in multimedia technology, 2001; Capella University, doctoral student in educational leadership and management. Occuption: Technology director for Hampton Township School District.Quote: 'It's a pretty significant recognition, and it says a lot about our Pittsburgh region in general because there's a lot of collaboration with the foundations, the universities and the Allegheny Intermediate Unit. ... We're in the national spotlight.'

Noteworthy: Received the 2013 Withrow Chief Technology Officer Award from the Consortium for School Networking. The consortium describes Frank Withrow as a pioneer and champion in the use of technology in K-12 education.

Age: 39

Residence: Hampton

Family: Wife, Amy; daughter, Maria, 2.

Occupation: Technology director for Hampton Township School District.

Education: Bachelor's in biology, 1995, and Master's in multimedia technology, 2001, both from Duquesne University; doctoral student in educational leadership and management at Capella University, an online school.

Quote: “It's a pretty significant recognition, and it says a lot about our Pittsburgh region in general because there's a lot of collaboration with the foundations, the universities and the Allegheny Intermediate Unit. ... We're in the national spotlight.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.