No lower taxes confounds Leet residents
By Bobby Cherry
Published: Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 10:12 p.m.
Some Leet residents are questioning why the municipality's tax rate wasn't adjusted to compensate for higher Allegheny County property reassessments.
The 2013 tax rate remains at 7 mills, same as 2012, tax bills mailed this week showed.
The assessed value of property in Leet increased about 39 percent, from $92 million in 2012 to about $128 million in 2013, according to Allegheny County data. Elected officials must, under state law, reduce the millage rate so as not to reap a “windfall” from a reassessment.
“Everybody was under the impression that instead of the gigantic windfall, they'd lower the millage,” resident Dan Reeping said of the tax bills property owners began receiving.
Leet's tax rate has been 7 mills since at least 2010.
Reeping said his township tax bill increased about $300 on his 1975-built Colonial style home, which has an assessed value of $186,000, according to county real estate figures.
Leet council President Gary Bradel and Vice President Wayne Hyjek did not return calls seeking comment on Wednesday. Leet manager Anna Lee Oswald and solicitor Richard Start also did not return calls.
Taxing bodies are permitted to collect 5 percent more in revenue compared to the prior year; to collect more than that requires a judge's approval.
Eric Montarti, a policy analyst with the nonprofit Downtown-based Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, said in order to not gain revenue from the assessments, Leet officials would have needed to establish a tax rate of about 4.99 mills.
“The way this process is supposed to work … they need to roll their millage rates back,” Montarti said.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Donor name to be stripped from Penn Hills library
- Web of surveillance videos helps ensnare suspect in East Liberty slayings
- Newsmaker: Joseph Bonadio
- FirstEnergy last to get smart meter OK
- Suspect in East Liberty slayings may be part of murder-for-hire case
- A developer’s lawsuit sets up high stakes for Pittsburgh Cultural Trust
- Qualifications of Peduto nominee for building inspection chief come up short
- House fire in Carnegie, no injuries reported
- On Pittsburgh visit, ambassador says $15B in aid to Ukraine shows support
- State Superior Court denies ex-Sen. Jane Orie’s corruption appeal
- CCAC to offer early retirement incentives