CDC map shows killer bacteria presence in Pennsylvania, 41 other states
Pennsylvania is among 42 states that have reported cases of largely untreatable infections caused by a drug-resistant bacteria called CRE, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported on its website.
The bacteria, officially known as carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae, kill up to half of patients who get bloodstream infections from them, the CDC warned in a new report on Tuesday. The report did not say how many patients the bacteria killed.
CRE cases were identified in the report only by region — Northeast, Midwest, South, etc. A CDC spokeswoman on Tuesday would not identify the states where cases have been confirmed. On Wednesday, the Trib found the accompanying map on the CDC's website showing the 42 states with reported cases.
The superbug has not been found in the community at large. Infections typically occur in patients who often have catheters or ventilators and are receiving medical care in hospitals, long-term acute-care facilities or nursing homes. The bacteria have been more prevalent in the Northeast region, which includes Pennsylvania, the CDC said.
Only six states require CRE cases to be reported to health officials. Pennsylvania does not require reporting.
The bacteria are part of a family of germs that are a normal part of a healthy digestive system. They cause infections, usually of the bloodstream or urinary tract, when they get into the bladder or blood. Some species of the bacteria have become resistant to almost all antibiotics.
Luis Fábregas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7998 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.