911th could learn fate as early as this week
The more than 2,000 military and civilian employees stationed at the Air Force Reserve's base in Moon could learn Wednesday whether the base will close.
The Pentagon plans to announce a decision by new Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh on which bases will receive the additional C-130 cargo planes mandated in the defense spending bill President Obama signed in January, Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said Monday.
She confirmed that Pentagon officials are meeting with the House and Senate Armed Services Committee and several other groups on Wednesday but couldn't confirm whether one of those meetings concerns the 911th or comment on how the decision affects the 911th.
Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, confirmed the delegation is meeting with the Pentagon on Wednesday. Hagel, before his confirmation, agreed to keep an open mind about the base and meet with the delegation, he said.
“I sure hope it's good news,” Casey said. “We've had a good case to make. The 911th sells itself.”
A staff member for Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, also confirmed the meeting. Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, and Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, couldn't be reached for comment.
The Air Force announced in February 2012 that it planned to close the base this year as part of a national plan to cut military spending and reduce its fleet of planes. The Defense Department put the plan on hold in July.
The Air Force formed a working group in January to look at how the military could implement a congressional mandate that it keep a minimum of 358 cargo planes instead of the 326 cargo planes it planned for in its 2013 budget.
The 911th has eight C-130 cargo planes.
Murphy made a pitch to the working group in February, pointing out the Moon air base's relatively low operating costs and reliability in harsh weather. Casey, Toomey and Doyle have also pressured the Air Force to reconsider its decision.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Controversial McKeesport building destroyed by fire
- Firefighter hurt in 3-alarm fire at Jefferson Hills restaurant
- Construction to affect Parkway West Thursday, Friday
- Pennsylvania religious freedom law does not extend to for-profits
- Planned Uptown revival priority for City of Pittsburgh
- None hurt in Duquesne house fire
- Ex-prosecutor concerned with latest Pa. child abuse findings
- Arrivals from Paris soon will avoid extra screening at Pittsburgh International
- North Versailles couple faults construction company for damage to property
- With ‘Ravenstahl Field’ awaiting approval, Pittsburgh City Council approves naming guidelines
- Pa. woman charged with forging docs to claim she was an attorney