Pittsburgh may change maligned off-duty fee system for police, paramedics, firefighters
Pittsburgh's public safety departments should standardize fee collection from outside businesses that hire police, paramedics and firefighters to provide security and other services, city officials said Tuesday.
Doing so could help the city avoid missteps that led to a federal investigation of how the police department's special events office has handled tens of thousands of dollars in administrative fees that businesses pay to hire off-duty police officers.
“The system that we have has failed,” said Councilman Bill Peduto. “It's not only ripe for corruption, but it's also a burden to anybody that tries to pay for anything from an off-duty officer to a parking permit. The entire system needs to be overhauled.”
A group of council members, police labor union officials and representatives of Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's office are examining how fees are collected by the police and other public safety departments to create a more transparent, accountable system, said Public Safety Director Michael Huss.
In 2012, Pittsburgh's Emergency Medical Services department collected $891,000 in hourly wages and a 10 percent administrative fee from businesses and event organizers that hired paramedics for off-duty work, according to acting EMS Chief Mark Bocian's office.
The money went into a trust fund, much of which the paramedics received for their pay.
Huss' office could not specify how much came from the fee and how much from wages.
City Controller Michael Lamb said that flaw makes it nearly impossible to determine whether the administrative fee is being spent appropriately.
The FBI is investigating allegations that some of the $3.85-an-hour fee paid to the police department's office of special events was diverted to a secret account at the Greater Pittsburgh Police Federal Credit Union.
“We have to be able to distinguish between money that belongs to the city and money that doesn't,” Lamb said.
Huss said he's confident the paramedics fee has been spent appropriately on EMS supplies and equipment, such as EMS motorcycles and other small vehicles that can navigate crowded venues.
Unlike the police system — which entails some businesses paying police officers who serve as schedulers and others paying the city directly — arrangements for paramedics are made through a single contact, Chief Ron Romano, Huss said.
EMS collects the second-most money behind police, and Huss said he was “very comfortable” with the way its system is run, along with that of the fire department and Bureau of Building Inspection.
“Can we make it better and more transparent? I think we can. We need to be consistent with all of them, so we're going to change them,” he said.
Paramedics work at an average of 56 events a month, according to the city's 2013 budget.
They set up medical tents, provide ambulances on standby and offer first aid at sporting and concert venues, conventions and outdoor festivals, according to the department's special events website.
The fire department doesn't charge a consistent administrative fee, Huss said. Permit and other expenses associated with using off-duty firefighters and fire trucks at events, such as fireworks displays, totaled $42,314 in 2012.
That money goes into the city's general fund.
Fees paid to the Bureau of Building Inspection for inspecting ticket, food and merchandise vending licenses brought in $20,062 in 2012.
The fees and wages for EMS, fire and BBI totaled $953,370 last year, far less than the estimated $6.7 million that flows annually from bars, restaurants, construction firms and other private businesses to off-duty police officers, who receive about $40 an hour, and to the department, which collects the $3.85-per-hour fee.
“Public safety should follow the same rules that parks and recreation follows, or building inspection follows or every other department follows,” Peduto said. “It should be modernized to make it easy and accountable for people.”
Jeremy Boren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7935 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Artist born without arms, legs gives Hampton students peek into her world
- 10th DUI earns Uptown man 1st prison sentence
- Fired Plum officer won’t get job back
- Bangladeshis to speak at Pitt in program against sweatshops
- Wolf’s education proposal gets mixed reviews
- Lawrenceville man charged with rape, child pornography and 27 other sexual offenses
- Pittsburgh’s Downtown tops ranking of small to midsized cities
- McKees Rocks father allegedly wanted to kill unborn
- Teacher conduct under spotlight in Pennsylvania
- Whistleblower claims Allegheny County’s human services director violated 2003 lawsuit settlement
- Inmate care in Allegheny County Jail generates worries