Share This Page

Newsmaker: Karen Derzic

| Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Karen Derzic of Brighton Heights. She won the 2012 Community Advocate Award from the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh. She is the newsmaker for March 27, 2013. Slug: ptr-pnews-032713

Noteworthy: The Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh named Derzic its 2012 Community Advocate of the Year. The award honors outstanding community members who demonstrate a commitment to further the mission and vision of the Carnegie Library.

Age: 41

Residence: Brighton Heights

Family: Husband, Jwan Allen

Occupation: Research coordinator at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC

Education: Bachelor's degree in human sexuality and women's studies at the University of Pittsburgh

Background: Derzic is president of the Friends of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh in Woods Run and secretary of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Friends Council. With her help, the Friends raised nearly $6,000 annually for library programming in 2011 and 2012. As a member of the Friends Council, she led efforts to update its bylaws and is working on a Friends' annual report to share fundraising ideas and best practices across the system.

Quote: “Libraries are ever-changing and growing. I'd like to see that continue. You couldn't borrow a laptop years ago, and now you borrow a laptop and sit in the library and have your private space. Just to see how the library is evolving, keeping up with what's happening out there is awesome.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.