Share This Page

Newsmaker: Kevin Zollman

| Saturday, March 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Ken Andreyo | Carnegie Mellon University
Kevin Zollman, 33, of Greenfield received a Faculty Early Career Development Award, worth $400,000 over five years.

Noteworthy: Zollman received a Faculty Early Career Development Award, worth $400,000 over five years, from the National Science Foundation to study the effects of incentives on scientists who work to secure funding, publish papers and receive promotions.

Age: 33

Residence: Greenfield

Family: Lives with longtime girlfriend Korryn Mozisek

Occupation: Associate professor of philosophy in Carnegie Mellon University's Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences

Background: Zollman joined CMU in 2008 as the first Herbert Simon Postdoctoral Fellow of Scientific Philosophy. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on rational choice, philosophy of economics and social epistemology, or the study of knowledge and justified belief.

Education: Bachelor's degree in philosophy from Kansas State University; master's and doctorate degrees in philosophy from the University of California, Irvine.

Quote: “A lot of people are concerned the incentives given to particular scientists might not be good for science as a whole.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.