Downloaders, beware: 'Free' can come at a heavy price
Adele's latest album is out and you want it, but don't want to pay for it.
So you download software from one of 2,800 different networks that allow users to share files for free.
Napster, released in 1999, was the first company to popularize the technology until it ran into copyright problems with the music industry over people sharing songs without paying artists. Now many networks — such as LimeWire, BitTorrent and others — allow users to share large files that can be used for legitimate purposes such as software distribution.
These networks should not be confused with retail sites such as iTunes or Amazon that sell music and videos, or ones such as Netflix that direct-stream movies to paying customers.
Concerns with free file-sharing sites arise when users inadvertently agree to allow the software to automatically configure the settings to share more files than they realize from a computer, experts warn. Other users then might be able to access personal and work files from your computer's hard drive.
Hackers can use file-sharing to spread hidden viruses, worms and other software that can harm a computer. You might think you're downloading a wallpaper of Justin Bieber, but you end up infecting your computer with malware.
Sharing certain files could lead to prosecution. Downloading pirated software or copyrighted material without paying for it can lead to fines or legal action.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.