Share This Page

Lawyer: Pittsburgh police officer's intensity a repeat

| Friday, March 22, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

A Pittsburgh police officer's alleged use of excessive force at a Station Square nightclub is “strikingly similar” to allegations from an incident involving the same officer three years ago, a Pittsburgh lawyer said on Thursday.

Edward Lojak Jr., 28, suffered a cracked rib, a broken nose and other injuries when Detective David Honick tackled him on Saturday outside Whim Night Club.

Honick, who joined the force in November 2003, is similarly accused in a federal civil lawsuit of breaking an Apollo man's cheekbone in three places on Feb. 27, 2010, outside Saddle Ridge in Station Square.

Honick, who was in uniform working off-duty detail both times, declined to comment.

Taylor Condarcure, 26, said in the lawsuit filed in September that he was entering the bar with his fiancee when a group of security guards told him to leave.

Condarcure told the guards that he had not done anything wrong when Honick punched him in the face as another officer held him from behind.

Condarcure “required surgery to correct the damage done to his face,” the lawsuit stated. “He still is not able to fully open his mouth.”

Police charged Condarcure with aggravated assault, disorderly conduct and criminal trespass. A judge found him not guilty in August 2011.

In addition to Honick, Condarcure's lawsuit names four other officers, Saddle Ridge, the city and former police Chief Nate Harper as defendants.

“When you have a federal case against you and this happens — and the incidents appear to be similar — it shows that maybe there is a pattern here,” said Lojak attorney Phil DiLucente.

Honick said in a police report that he saw Lojak “running up behind” another officer “and closing on him yelling with his fists gripped tight.” A Whim security guard knocked Lojak to his knees, but he “sprung back up,” so Honick knocked him back down.

“He landed face-first on the pavement causing a laceration to his face and nose,” Honick said.

Lojak is charged with disorderly conduct, public drunkenness, drug possession, obstructing officers, aggravated harassment by a prisoner and resisting arrest.

No action has been taken against any of the officers involved.

Margaret Coleman, an attorney representing Condarcure in his lawsuit, said the incidents are “strikingly similar to one another.”

Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or abrandolph@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.