Wilkinsburg woman dies in crash during Fla. police chase
A Wilkinsburg woman vacationing in Florida was killed last week in the crash of a vehicle that police say they were pursuing following an armed robbery in St. Petersburg.
Dijon Senay Jackson, 19, died in the crash shortly after 8 p.m. on Thursday.
Jackson was a passenger in a car driven by Alfonso Eugene Mackey, 31, of St. Petersburg, who was released from prison in October after serving a 10-year sentence for carjacking, police said. He is to be charged with the robbery, police said.
A police news release says that investigators do not know if Jackson had any involvement in the holdup that occurred in a Family Dollar Store.
According to police:
Mackey was carrying a handgun when he and another man went into the store and demanded cash. Mackey fired the gun once and grabbed several packs of cigarettes before fleeing.
Police spotted the getaway vehicle — carrying three people — a few minutes later and began chasing it. Officers believe the second suspect got out of the car during the chase.
Mackey passed at least one vehicle in a no-passing area before his car began sliding and crashed into a tree. Jackson was pronounced dead at the scene.
Police said they don't know whether Jackson, who lived with her grandmother, was waiting inside the getaway vehicle or got into it after the holdup.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.