Blush strip club's plea for return of off-duty Pittsburgh officers goes to federal court
The Pittsburgh police bureau is hurting strip clubs by prohibiting off-duty officers from working security details there, an attorney for Blush said Thursday.
Jonathan Kamin, who represents the Downtown strip club, plans to seek a court injunction to halt a policy that acting Chief Regina McDonald instituted March 13 banning police from providing off-duty security at strip clubs.
The city had the case moved to federal court, saying Blush's complaint alleges constitutional violations. Solicitor Dan Regan declined comment, saying the city would argue its position in court.
Kamin said the city is violating the Constitution's equal protection guarantees by singling out strip clubs. Officers are permitted to work off-duty details at other businesses.
“You can't selectively apply the law, and that's what (McDonald's) doing,” he said.
Kamin said the case was assigned late in the day to a federal judge, so he did not have a chance to ask for an injunction. He plans to do that on Monday.
Blush has always hired private security to work inside the club, Kamin said, but puts armed police officers in uniform at the door. Since the ban went into effect, private security has worked the door, he said.
He described the club as a “pillar of the community,” offering adult entertainment since 1964 without problems. As many as 350 people come to the club on weekends, Kamin said.
The building originally housed the Edison Hotel in 1934 before becoming the New Edison Hotel and, eventually, Blush.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.