When Pittsburgh flies rainbow flag, some see red
A rainbow flag flying outside the City-County Building, Downtown, led Mary Ann Burkhart to take a stand.
Burkhart of Bethel Park took issue with a decision by Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's administration to hoist the flag representing the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community on Wednesday, when the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments for a second day on gay marriage.
“This is outrageous,” Burkhart said on Thursday. “What's the message here? You can't not speak up.”
Ravenstahl's office received a few calls about the flag, a symbol of gay pride, that it said flew “in recognition” of the high court's consideration of the federal law defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
Marissa Doyle, a Ravenstahl spokeswoman, said she was not sure if all the callers complained. She said workers took down the flag, which flew below the American flag and the city flag, after rallies on Wednesday in support of gay marriage.
Still, it left Burkhart seeing red.
“Lesbians, gays and transsexuals are honored ... under a flag that many people have died for?” she said. “I'm crying for my country.”
Lyndsey Sickler, executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Pittsburgh, said flying the rainbow flag lifted the spirits of people in Pittsburgh's LGBT community.
“It is important that our city government shows its solidarity with the ... community,” said Sickler of Beechview. “It hasn't always been that way.”
The city sometimes hoists other flags in addition to the American and city flags. It flew an Arbor Day Foundation's Tree City USA Flag in April.
The rainbow flag has been raised outside the City-County Building for the past two years during Gay Pride Week in June, said Jim Sheppard, special assistant to the mayor.
Craig Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5646 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 1 intruder killed, other shot and wounded in Carrick home invasion
- Transplant patients in limbo over coverage under UPMC-Highmark pact
- Board to examine use of sanitary authority vehicles
- $24M water filter project at Aspinwall treatment plant nears kickoff
- Motive remains unclear in slaying of Kennedy Township man
- Fitzgerald stacks legislative wins as Allegheny council members struggle
- United States proposes tougher rules for moving crude oil, ethanol by rail
- Penn Hills man identified as Allentown shooting victim
- Revised anti-nepotism policy lets Allegheny County judges keep family in jobs
- Bucar grilled by City Council, likely to win approval as public safety chief
- Allegheny Health Network offers glimpse of Pine ‘medical mall’