Pittsburgh Housing Authority numbers raise red flags
The Pittsburgh Housing Authority gave city auditors and the IRS conflicting information on how much money an authority-run nonprofit raised and spent.
The Housing Authority told auditors that Clean Slate E3 Inc. raised $101,841 and spent $40,371 in 2010, but the agency reported $227,255 in revenue and $12,718 in expenses on its tax return.
In 2011, the nonprofit raised $82,261 and spent $64,342, according to an audit released on Wednesday by city Controller Michael Lamb. On its 2011 tax return the nonprofit reported $57,256 in revenue and $39,338 in expenses.
“Clean Slate, I think, raises a lot of red flags,” Lamb said, adding that the authority refused to answer many of the auditor's questions. “My mandate is to audit all of the city's component agencies. The fact that they've been so uncooperative in this situation is a real problem.”
Authority officials did not return repeated calls for comment.
Lamb said the authority blamed the revenue conflict in 2010 to a transfer of funds from another nonprofit with a similar name, Clean Slate.
The authority had not filed 2011 tax returns before the audit was complete and Lamb was unaware of that year's discrepancy.
Auditors also found problems with an annual golf outing Clean Slate E3 used to raise 78 percent of its revenue in 2010 and 86 percent in 2011.
The authority refused to give auditors the names of outing participants. Lamb said the fundraiser represents a potential conflict of interest for authority officials, who sit on the nonprofit's board.
“When you are having personnel from the housing authority soliciting contributions from people who are hoping to get contracts from the housing authority, that's a conflict,” Lamb said. “We think it's important for them to have an independent third party operating that organization.”
Clean Slate board members include Chief Financial Officer Edward Mauk, authority spokeswoman Michelle Jackson and authority board Chairman Ricky Burgess, a city councilman.
Burgess said he was not involved in the fundraiser and referred all other questions about the audit to authority Executive Director Caster Binion.
“I have not participated in the outing, nor have I solicited any money for the outing,” said Burgess of North Point Breeze. “I oversee the budget (for Clean Slate E3).”
Binion said in a written response attached to the audit that the authority would consider creating a separate entity to oversee the nonprofit.
Lamb also said Clean Slate E3 was not fulfilling its mission of awarding scholarships to needy kids. The agency recorded a $232,422 surplus at the end of 2011, but awarded only $19,000 in scholarships for 2010 and 2011.
“When they're raising that much money to support that kind of program, they should be awarding more money,” he said.
In his response letter, Binion said the authority would consider partnering with the Pittsburgh Promise, which offers college scholarships to qualifying students in city schools.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ross brothers ordered to pay fine, remove debris from Christmas display
- Pittsburgh councilwoman: Peduto seeks to reroute money from North Side project in retribution
- Newsmaker: Terri Liberto
- State law complicates Allegheny County proposal for letter grading of restaurants
- Pittsburgh police officers start wearing video cameras
- 12-year-old’s donated heart joins families, lets her memory live
- Beechview man arrested on child pornography charges
- Proposal to limit access divides Penn Hills, Homewood neighborhoods
- Rules hamper Franklin Regional attack victim scholarships
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat
- Legal titans prepared to tussle in Ferrante cyanide homicide trial