TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Rule on Allegheny County assessment appeal representation criticized

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Bobby Kerlik
Saturday, March 30, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
 

A proposal to change the way property owners may be represented during assessment appeals is drawing criticism from several Allegheny County Council members.

The county's Board of Property Assessment and Review approved a rule this month that requires property owners who pay for representation to appeal their assessments to hire an attorney or a certified property manager. Family, friends and others who represent people for free do not have to be attorneys or certified property managers.

The point of the change, according to board solicitor David Montgomery, is “to protect the public” and bring Allegheny County's standards in line with many others in the state.

“It prevents non-attorneys from representing people for compensation. We've seen a lot of problems with non-attorneys in terms of the quality and consistency — from being prepared to the quality of their evidence,” Montgomery said. “Our conclusion is that the public is better served to have attorneys and property managers.”

County council can scrap all rule changes the board proposes. Ten members signed onto a motion to stop the rule change from taking effect. A vote could come at council's meeting on Tuesday.

“For them to decide who a taxpayer needs to bring in front of them is not right. So (the board) is deciding who makes money?” said Jim Ellenbogen, D-Banksville. “Suppose your grandmother can't afford an attorney, but she knows a real estate professional who will do it for a couple bucks. It's her right to decide who can represent her.”

The proposed rule change would permit employees of organizations that own property, such as a school district business manager, to appear before the board.

Montgomery said council will have the final say and noted that the public has a recourse if an attorney does a poor job, such as reporting someone to the state's Disciplinary Board.

Amie Downs, spokeswoman for County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, said the administration supports council members who oppose the rule change.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or bkerlik@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Peduto blasts Wolf’s plan to borrow $3B to shore up pensions
  2. Derry boy recovering at home after high-profile intestinal transplant
  3. Woman crashes car at Pittsburgh federal building after high-speed chase
  4. Pittsburgh is planning to add network of bike lanes through Oakland
  5. Fugitive arrested at Plum motel on drug, gun charges
  6. Public Utility Commission will consider fare hikes
  7. School credit ratings a problem for several in Western Pennsylvania
  8. Judge adds 2 years to sentence of Baldwin Borough man acquitted of murder
  9. Newsmaker: Jesabel I. Rivera-Guerra
  10. 2 firefighters injured in Millvale house fire
  11. Thief’s attorney blames Rivers Casino; judge isn’t swayed