Share This Page

Newsmaker: Heidi Ondek

| Saturday, April 6, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Heidi Ondek, 50, of Sewickley recently was named the recipient of the 2013 Distinguished Female Educator Award from the Tri-State Area School Study Council, which is part of the University of Pittsburgh School of Education.

Noteworthy: Ondek received the 2013 Distinguished Female Educator Award from the Tri-State Area School Study Council, which is part of the University of Pittsburgh School of Education. The award recognizes educators for their “leadership within their school districts and communities, as well as their mentorship and assistance extended to others.”

Age: 50

Residence: Sewickley

Family: Husband, Ed; son, Eddie, 9; four adult daughters; and five grandchildren

Occupation: Assistant superintendent of Quaker Valley Schools

Background: Ondek was principal of Quaker Valley High School from 2004 to 2006. Previously, she was an elementary principal in the Northgate School District for seven years. She also served as director of special education, curriculum and staff development for the Fort Cherry School District. She began her career as a special education teacher.

Education: Bachelor o f Science in education from Slippery Rock University in 1984 and a Master of Science in education from Duquesne University in 1993. She earned a doctorate in administrative and policy studies at the University of Pittsburgh in 2003.

Quote: “One of the reasons I am getting this award is because of the work I've done as a mentor, so to be recognized by those who mentored me is quite an honor.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.