DEP to host public hearing on Lawrence County's Hickory Run Energy Station project
A Lawrence County power plant project that's headed for approval has its next public hearing on Wednesday at the North Beaver Volunteer Fire Department.
The $750 million Hickory Run Energy Station received its local permits this year and must get permits from state environmental regulators. The Department of Environmental Protection is hosting the hearing starting at 6 p.m.
The DEP will limit the amount of solid pollution, known as total dissolved solids, that the gas-fueled plant can leave in wastewater it dumps in the Beaver River. Hickory Run is getting its cooling water from a sanitation plant that dumps processed water into the Beaver. That means it won't increase the river's amount of dissolved solids, but the plants could dump processed water at the same time, department spokesman Kevin Sunday said.
“As long as it's treated, we have no problem with it,” said James A. Riggio, general manager at the Beaver Falls Municipal Authority, which has a drinking water intake downstream. Riggio said neither the DEP nor the proposed plant's owner, New Jersey-based LS Power, told him of the project upstream.
Sunday declined to give details. The project manager at LS Power did not return requests for comment.
Local government leaders support the project, Lawrence County officials said. They're increasingly confident the 900-megawatt plant will get built, despite at least six proposed projects aimed at using inexpensive natural gas to replace coal-fired power plants closing around Western Pennsylvania.
Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.