Pitt Law School names new public service award for late activist
The University of Pittsburgh Law School announced on Monday that it will name a new award after J. Evans Rose, the late Pittsburgh lawyer and political activist who mentored two generations of Pennsylvania GOP leaders.
Pitt officials said the university and its Dick Thornburgh Forum for Law and Public Policy established the J. Evans Rose Prize for Public Service.
“(He) believed that everyone should play an active part in the political system, and his lifetime of service as political adviser was legendary,” Pitt Chancellor Mark Nordenberg said.
Thornburgh, the former two-term governor and U.S. attorney general, said Rose was among the most admired political figures in Pennsylvania.
“Beyond possessing remarkable skills in fundraising, he had superior political instincts and a well-developed sense of ethics and propriety in the sometimes rough-and-tumble world of politics,” Thornburgh said.
Rose, who died July 20, was managing partner and chair of the Rose, Schmidt, Hasley and Disalle law firm for three decades. He was a director and member of the executive committee of the Pittsburgh firm Cohen and Grigsby.
The winner of the Rose Prize also receives $4,000.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.