Bail revoked for suspect in shooting of policeman
A Homewood teen waited until Pittsburgh police Officer Christopher Kertis fell to the ground before he opened fire.
“He's got a gun,” an officer yelled as Dante Bonner, 19, got off at least two shots — striking Kertis twice in the left leg.
Kertis, a two-year veteran, picked himself up and returned fire, wounding Bonner, according to a video taken at 3:43 a.m. March 17 from the officer's patrol car.
The district attorney's office on Thursday played the video during Bonner's bail hearing before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski. Borkowski revoked Bonner's $250,000 bond on charges of attempted homicide, assaulting a police officer, recklessly endangering another person and illegally possessing a firearm. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for May 16.
Authorities said Kertis and his partner, Officer Charles Thomas, followed Bonner as he sped down Fifth Avenue and pulled into an empty parking lot of the Port Authority bus garage off Fifth Avenue in East Liberty.
The video shows Bonner running from the car seconds after he put it in park. Kertis runs after him before the shootout ensues. The incident unfolded in less than two minutes.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said Kertis is out of the hospital and working toward recovery. Bonner is being held at the Allegheny County Jail.
Mike Manko, a spokesman for DA Stephen A. Zappala Jr., said his office's review of the incident is pending.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.