Share This Page

Interim county health chief out of running

| Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 10:29 p.m.

Dr. Ronald Voorhees, acting health director for Allegheny County since June, no longer wants the job on a permanent basis.

Voorhees said he withdrew from consideration in March, citing personal health concerns and a wish to focus on programs in early-childhood development.

The county Board of Health, which appointed him last May as interim director, is scheduled to hear an update Wednesday on the search for a director.

“I think at this time of needing to rebuild the health department, (the director) needs to be at full strength,” Voorhees said on Tuesday. He said migraines limit him on that front.

Voorhees called support for early-childhood development “the most important thing we should be doing in public health.”

“I've really become convinced of the urgency to develop and more widely expand programs to provide nurturing, safe and secure starts for kids,” he said.

Voorhees, 58, of Regent Square said he hopes to keep a position in the health department, where he has worked since 2008. He does not know when a search committee of board members will name his successor.

Board member Edith Shapira said the board will receive an update on the director search at its 12:30 p.m. meeting at the Clack Health Center, Building 7, 301 39th St., Lawrenceville. She declined to say when the board might select someone.

The board fired longtime director Dr. Bruce Dixon in March 2012. He died Feb. 20 at age 74.

Adam Smeltz is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676 or asmeltz@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.