Pittsburgh's busways ranked among best in country
A New York transit policy group ranks Port Authority of Allegheny County's East, West and South busways among the nation's top bus rapid transit lines.
“Out of seven corridors in the nation that are considered true bus rapid transit, Pittsburgh has three,” said Iva Benson, spokeswoman for the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy.
Institute officials will host a news conference on Wednesday morning near the Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway to discuss rankings from its recently released report, BRT Standard. The report identifies common features of BRT lines, which are growing in popularity worldwide but vary widely from city to city. Common features include dedicated lanes and rights-of-way for buses.
The report recognizes the world's top 67 BRT lines. Port Authority's Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway was named a Bronze Standard BRT line. The nine-mile line between Downtown and Swissvale opened 30 years ago and carries about 25,000 passengers a day. The West and South busways were recognized as Basic BRT lines.
Port Authority and community groups are studying ways to develop a BRT line between Downtown and Oakland, with possible extensions to neighborhoods farther east.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.