TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Lawyer: Military's housing choice irrelevant

Ryan D. Maseth, 24, of Shaler
Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 11:33 p.m.
 

A federal jury can determine whether a Defense contractor is responsible for the electrocution death of a Shaler soldier without second-guessing the military's choice of where to house troops in Iraq, a lawyer for the soldier's parents argued Tuesday.

The jury doesn't have to decide whether the Army made the right choice in housing Sgt. Ryan Maseth, 24, in a building with a substandard electrical system to determine whether KBR Inc. of Houston had the discretion to fix the water pump that electrocuted Maseth while he was taking a shower, said William Stickman.

If the jury decides the Army tied KBR's hands, “we simply lose,” he told a three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which was hearing oral arguments in the Downtown federal courthouse.

Cheryl Harris of Cranberry and Douglas Maseth of Allison Park want the appeals court to reinstate their lawsuit against KBR Inc. for the Jan. 2, 2008, death of their son at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex in Iraq.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer dismissed the lawsuit in July based on her finding that she couldn't rule on whether KBR caused Maseth's death without evaluating the Army's decision to house him and other soldiers in the building.

Stickman argued that KBR's contract with the military gave it the discretion to analyze and fix problems during service calls it made to the barracks before Maseth's death.

Lawrence Ebner, one of KBR's lawyers, argued there was no way for a jury to rule on whether KBR was responsible for Maseth's death without probing the military's decision.

Circuit Court Judge D. Michael Fisher questioned whether the case really requires the jury to determine whether the military made the right decision.

The case seems to come down to “was it KBR's fault, or was it the military's decision that led to Sgt. Maseth's electrocution,” he said.

Circuit Judge D. Brooks Smith also said it seemed like a factual question rather than a policy question.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Deputies arrest couple, seize 45 bricks of heroin in Penn Hills
  2. 2 Georgia men charged in Pittsburgh jury duty scam
  3. Pittsburgh pair plans rare trip to Iran for American classical musicians
  4. 10,000 more plots for veterans planned at National Cemetery of Alleghenies
  5. Security agents discover handgun in man’s carry-on at Pittsburgh International Airport
  6. Now debt-free, August Wilson Center to offer bookings again
  7. Marshall-Shadeland man gets prison term for weapons charge
  8. Mock trial team from Florida university wins national competition in Pittsburgh
  9. Community College of Allegheny County puts $22M into building renovations at North Side campus
  10. Social media tip-offs missed in melee outside Monroeville Mall, security specialist says
  11. Teachers union advises lawyers for colleagues of Plum pair investigated on sex charges