Well-worn Three Rivers Heritage Trail earns fix
A runner runs past a section of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail along the North Shore on Thursday, May 9, 2013, as crews detoured trail traffic around an area that they are preparing for resurfacing next week.
Photo by Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
A rut-ridden section of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail is about to get a $200,000 facelift.
An almost 2-mile section between 600 River Ave. on the North Shore and Millvale will be closed from Monday through Friday as crews raise the trail by 5 inches, improve drainage and replace the trail's crushed-limestone surface with recycled asphalt.
Trailhead parking facilities along River Avenue will be off limits during construction.
“Most people are tired of the ruts and puddles and only being able to use the trail in nice weather,” said Thomas Baxter, executive director of the nonprofit Friends of the Riverfront.
“This will be a significant improvement.”
Friends of the Riverfront won't pay anything. Baxter said city of Pittsburgh workers did site-preparation work free of charge, and Allegheny County will donate the recycled asphalt, together representing $100,000 in in-kind donations.
Three foundations that asked not to be identified are paying contractors up to $100,000 to do the work.
About 4,000 people a day use the trail for bicycling, running and walking. The number has grown since 2010, when officials opened a link to the trail from Millvale Riverfront Park, Baxter said.
“It'll be wonderful to have a fully developed hard surface trail,” said Eddie Figas, Millvale's community economic development director.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.