Bon Air woman completes run for Boston Marathon victims
Distance runner Kaitlyn Kacsuta on Wednesday finished raising money for the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings by running a few easy miles along the Monongahela River in the South Side.
The Tribune-Review in April wrote about Kacsuta's plan to run 180 miles in precisely 26 days to honor those injured and killed in a pair of bombings near the finish line of the prestigious 26.2-mile race on April 15. Kacsuta, 25, of Bon Air ran the Boston Marathon and was in a building near the finish line when she heard the explosions.
The third-year Duquesne University law school student committed to doing the runs amid a busy schedule of final exams and studying so that she could raise money for The One Fund Boston, a victims relief fund that has collected more than $30.1 million.
Fellow runners and those who heard about Kacsuta's effort on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube gave hundreds of dollars in donations in their own names and hers, she said.
“I'm just glad I got some people to donate to One Fund Boston,” Kacsuta said.
Kacsuta chronicled her distances by posting snapshots of her GPS-enabled Garmin running watch on Twitter after each run. She said the experience was rewarding but challenging. She typically ran 7 to 8 miles a day.
“The last week or so, I felt kind of drained,” she said. “My legs just don't have the giddy-up that they would normally.”
Her longest run was 13.1 miles May 5 at the Pittsburgh Half-Marathon, which she finished in 1:41:34.
Jeremy Boren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7935 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.