Voluntary mastectomies to reduce breast cancer risk becoming more common
By Adam Smeltz
Published: Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Actress Angelina Jolie told the world on Tuesday that she prefers life over breasts, announcing a voluntary double mastectomy that dropped her inherited cancer risk from 87 percent to 5 percent.
Women across Western Pennsylvania are way ahead of her.
“We see it more and more every day,” said Dr. Kandace McGuire, director of premenopausal breast-cancer services at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC. She said about half of Magee patients diagnosed with a so-called breast-cancer gene defect elect to undergo mastectomies, up at least 50 percent in the past five years.
At Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital in Greensburg, Dr. Rick Payha said he performs double mastectomies for women with the defect — in the genes known as BRCA 1 and 2 — once or twice a month. That's double the volume he did last year, he said.
“Women are becoming more aware of the (genetic) testing that's available, and doctors are becoming more aware of the risk factors that make a woman prone to have a genetic defect,” Payha said. “It's an education process.”
Genetic testing for breast cancer has been available for about a decade, but has become popular only in the past five years, physicians said. They said a blood test costing roughly $3,000 identifies the gene defect, which can raise the lifetime risk of breast cancer to 80 percent or higher.
And while high-profile cases such as Jolie's encourage testing, doctors said, new and better reconstruction methods make breast removal less traumatic.
“Not only do we have the ability to reconstruct the breast, but we can save pretty much all the skin,” McGuire said. “The breast looks essentially the same on the outside.”
Amisha Upadhyay, 30, of Regent Square underwent a voluntary double mastectomy last week and doesn't have a regret, she said. Diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation, she didn't want to be surprised any more after cancer appeared in one of her breasts when she was 29.
“I did not want to go through that process again,” Upadhyay said. “If I can take a step to take control of this process, I will do that. It's a no-brainer.”
Insurance companies generally provide partial payments for mastectomies and reconstruction for women who face strong genetic odds of breast cancer but have not been diagnosed with the disease, industry representatives said. The federal Affordable Care Act requires insurers to cover genetic screening for women with a known risk factor, such as a family history of breast cancer.
For them especially, Jolie's disclosure is a boon to awareness, said Pat Halpin-Murphy, founder of the nonprofit Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition. Breast removal can reduce their cancer risk to the single digits.
Halpin-Murphy doesn't want the news to panic women unnecessarily. She said BRCA genes are cited in only 5 percent of female breast-cancer cases. The rest appear to have other causes.
“For those women who do have a mother or a grandmother who died of breast cancer, it is important that they talk to their doctor about the possibility of genetic testing,” said Halpin-Murphy, a breast-cancer survivor.
She and her sister did not get genetic tests because they don't have a family history of the disease, she said.
At Allegheny General Hospital in the North Side, Dr. Shivani Duggal said she worries some women will misinterpret Jolie's message and demand blood work regardless of their family histories and other risk factors.
“That would not be ideal,” said Duggal, who works in breast oncology. “These tests are warranted in the high-risk populations.”
Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5676 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Century III new owner seeks to reverse vacancy trend with new theater
- Corrected performance profiles provided for Pennsylvania schools
- Newsmaker: Richard L. Byrne
- Hill District nonprofit’s finances are taking another dive
- Natural history museum in the red
- Likely $2.3B influx puts PennDOT big-ticket road projects in play
- Sandy Hook 911 calls fuel sensitivity debate
- Pittsburgh diocese extends peace offering to Catholics, non-Catholics
- Food stamp fraud, bloat overshadow debate on farm bill
- Farmers markets’ terminals ease sales
- Police say fellow cop arrested for drunk driving after coming to work intoxicated