Congressional leaders unswayed by VA promises
Pummeled in the media and on Capitol Hill because of continuing delays in processing benefits claims, the Department of Veterans Affairs instituted mandatory overtime hours as part of its pledge to resolve by 2015 a backlog estimated at more than 845,000 claims.
But congressional leaders remain unconvinced that the VA can make good on increasingly rosier projections and promises.
“They don't have a great track record,” Sen. Bob Casey Jr., a Scranton Democrat, said in an interview with the Tribune-Review. “Look at what's happened over the last year or so. They say that they're reducing the backlog and meeting their goals, but they only have hit their targets in 11 of the past 52 weeks, based on the numbers we have.
“It's just further evidence of how far behind (they are) — and how far they're going to be behind, unless they stay on track,” Casey said.
An honorably discharged veteran who files a compensation claim related to getting sick or being injured or wounded in the service faces delays of longer than six months in most of the country before receiving an initial decision, called a “rating” by the VA. The backlog ballooned despite a 40 percent increase in the VA's benefits budget in the past four years.
With more than $140 billion in annual discretionary and entitlement spending, VA has more employees than any federal agency except the Department of Defense. Unlike the Pentagon, however, the VA was spared from sequestration spending cuts and employee furloughs.
Casey and Sen. Dean Heller, a Nevada Republican, have emerged in recent weeks as a tag-team spearheading a bipartisan effort in the Senate to prod the VA and White House to end the backlog.
“You have 67 United States senators who rarely agree about anything, and they've come together. We're resolute and are doing this in a bipartisan fashion,” Casey said. “And when it comes to the actual resources, there's been a huge increase in resources. Now we want to see some return on that.”
Casey and Heller are motivated by the glut of claims and by especially long waits at VA field stations in their states for ratings on first-time claims. VA regional offices in Reno and Pittsburgh are second and third only to New York City in the length of delays — nearly two years — tallied while agency workers process initial claims.
When veterans disagree with agency ratings, a Trib investigation uncovered, their appeals drag on for years, rather than months.
On Tuesday, VA mandated overtime for the more than 15,000 workers who handle benefits claims, part of a “surge” of money and manpower the agency believes can eliminate the backlog by 2015.
Officials reported some progress, saying they trimmed the backlog by 2.6 percent in recent weeks.
“The key thing is what we're doing to move forward, and what we're doing (to ensure) that our veterans get the services they earned from their country,” said Kim A. Graves, director of the VA's Eastern Area claims operations, a territory that includes Pittsburgh's regional office.
VA officials say they've started getting results from an agency transformation that began in 2009 and has been rolled out in stages at the 56 regional offices. A centralized training program for claims processors, the implementation of quality-control teams and special mentors, plus reconfigured offices to streamline the system, are having an impact, they say.
The system, which is bogged down in mammoth stacks of paperwork, is moving toward using all-electronic records for new claims plus about 18 percent of others stuck in the backlog.
Appeals originating from VA offices encounter long waits — so long that many veterans die while their filings languish, a Tribune-Review investigation found. Between 2009 and 2013, the agency's Board of Veterans Appeals in Washington handled 2,936 claims involving GIs who died while awaiting a final decision. That's more than 500 veterans a year, or about one every 18 hours.
“From the secretary on down, every one of us recognizes that this is not acceptable,” said VA's Graves.
Carl Prine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7826 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ross brothers ordered to pay fine, remove debris from Christmas display
- Newsmaker: Terri Liberto
- Pittsburgh councilwoman: Peduto seeks to reroute money from North Side project in retribution
- State law complicates Allegheny County proposal for letter grading of restaurants
- Pittsburgh police officers start wearing video cameras
- 12-year-old’s donated heart joins families, lets her memory live
- Beechview man arrested on child pornography charges
- Rules hamper Franklin Regional attack victim scholarships
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat
- Pittsburgh police recruit arrested for supplying alcohol to 18-year-old for sexual favors
- Legal titans prepared to tussle in Ferrante cyanide homicide trial