ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Christopher W. Robinson

Jeremy Boren
| Saturday, June 1, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Christopher W. Robinson, 29, of Brentwood won the Vanguard Diversity Award from the Community College of Allegheny County.
Christopher W. Robinson, 29, of Brentwood won the Vanguard Diversity Award from the Community College of Allegheny County.

Noteworthy: Robinson won a Vanguard Diversity Award from the Community College of Allegheny County for his “commitment to providing culturally diverse and relevant educational programs and events to the students and staff of CCAC South Campus.”

Age: 29

Residence: Brentwood; originally from Kalamazoo, Mich.

Family: Single

Occupation: Assistant professor of social work at CCAC South Campus in West Mifflin; professional development coordinator for the CCAC Office of Professional Development; South Campus diversity officer for CCAC's Office of Institutional Diversity & Inclusion

Background: Robinson founded the House of Infiniti Pittsburgh, a traveling social-performance troupe. It's made up of African-American LGBT youths who participate in fashion and dance competitions known as balls.

Education: Bachelor's degree in social work from Jackson State University in Mississippi and a master's degree in social work from the University of Pittsburgh. Robinson is enrolled in a higher education and leadership studies doctoral program at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Quote: “I really appreciate CCAC for providing me with the opportunity to carry out some of the efforts to promote diversity that I believe in,” Robinson said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me