Link between Washington County bomb threats, bank heist probed
Law enforcement agencies are investigating whether a Wednesday morning bank robbery in Washington County was related to two school bomb threats.
“The million-and-one-dollar question is, ‘Is there a connection?' ” said Southwest Regional police Chief John Hartman. “It would defy logic to believe three incidents like this in such a small community wouldn't be. So we are looking into it.”
At 9:30 a.m., Bentworth School District officials notified police that they had received a bomb threat at the high school. Public safety officials were conducting a car-crash safety drill, Hartman said.
Police, fire and emergency response workers responded to the bomb threat, he said.
About that time, someone notified police that a PNC Bank branch in Bentleyville had been robbed.
“We flooded the area,” Hartman said.
Soon to follow was a report of another bomb threat at California Area High School.
Agents with the Allegheny County Bomb Squad and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives responded to the threat at Bentworth High School. California police and Washington County Emergency Management answered the call at California Area High School. Police found no bombs and officials closed both schools for the day.
Hartman said he did not know how much money was stolen.
Police are searching for a white male with thin build, wearing a black sweatshirt, jeans and black combat boots. He displayed a 9mm pistol and cleaned out all teller drawers before escaping eastbound on Interstate 70 in a black Dodge Charger, police said.
“Do I feel like we will be able to determine who did this? Yes,” Hartman said. “I have no doubt.”
Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.