ShareThis Page

Resolution sought on Pittsburgh man's leveled 'dream' house

| Tuesday, June 11, 2013, 12:08 a.m.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Andre Hall stands near the site of his former home in Sheraden on Monday afternoon, June 10, 2013. Hall alleges that his home was torn down mistakenly.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Andre Hall stands near the site of his former home in Sheraden on Monday afternoon, June 10, 2013. Hall alleges that his home was torn down mistakenly.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Andre Hall stands near the site of his former home in Sheraden on Monday afternoon, June 10, 2013. Hall alleges that his home was torn down mistakenly.

From a cracked sidewalk next to a vacant lot in Sheraden, Andre Hall recalled the chilly January morning he found crews at 3224 Motor St. mistakenly demolishing the 1,600-square-foot house he envisioned as the haven for his growing family.

“The contractors, the city, someone screwed up,” he said. “For two years, I've been waiting for anyone to acknowledge what happened to me, and then I see the contractor who tore down my dream still got paid. What about us?”

The city settled a lawsuit last week filed by demolition contractor John Deller, owner of P.J. Deller Inc. and Deller Professional Services Inc. Pittsburgh agreed to pay the Richland contractor $9,500 because Deller claimed the city failed to pay him for the 2011 demolition. Neither side admitted responsibility.

Hall, 42, said on Monday he plans to amend a civil claim he filed against Deller in August to include the city because he hasn't been compensated. Hall didn't estimate the value of his losses. He said he filed the lawsuit to force someone to acknowledge the mistake.

Neither Deller nor his attorney could be reached for comment.

“I wanted this to be a place for my three little girls to grow up,” Hall said. “When I got here, all my building materials — the wood, the drywall, this stuff I had ready to install — and my tools were missing. I still can't get work because no one wants to hire a guy in construction who doesn't have any tools.”

Hall said he is living alone in a one-bedroom apartment. His children are living in Kansas City, Kan., with their mother.

Hall entered into a sales agreement with property owners Harry and Lorraine Sweitzer for the value of at least eight years' worth of delinquent property taxes three months before P.J. Deller Inc., leveled the home, then valued at $42,800.

At the time, Hall said, the Sweitzers' back taxes were about $15,000.

Hall said he didn't make a payment, but he completed extensive improvements to the property and notified the Bureau of Building Inspection. The two-story home was scheduled for demolition in late 2010, but in November, the bureau rescinded the demolition order and notified Deller.

“They got a notice and filed an injunction the way they were supposed to,” city demolition manager Paul Loy said of Hall and Sweitzer.

When a property is condemned, a homeowner is notified with a home visit, including a to-do list and deadline and at least twice by mail. Owners may request more time, Loy said, “but demolition is always a last resort.”

“These two, they followed all the rules,” he said. “I still have no idea if it was a miscommunication on the part of the contractor or something with his crew. It doesn't matter. They screwed up. This shouldn't happen to someone when they're trying to fix up a home.”

The Sweitzers, who still owe $22,000 on the vacant property they paid $7,000 to buy in 1974, declined to discuss Hall's claims.

Lorraine Sweitzer, 68, said she's frustrated with Hall and the city.

“This isn't about (Hall),” Sweitzer said. “They tore down my house.”

Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5815 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.