Plum stroke survivor named Pennsylvania's 'Senior Hero'
Darnell Pope, 73, of Plum was named Pennsylvania’s outstanding senior volunteer as part of the Salute to Senior Service program. Pope, a stroke survivor, is being honored for his work at Plum Senior Community Center on Wednesday, June 12, 2013.
Photo by Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
When Darnell “Jeff” Pope of Plum came home after suffering a stroke in 2006, he said he was beaten.
“I thought everyone was staring at me. People don't know how long I sat in my wheelchair, staring out the window,” he said.
But after joining the Plum Community Senior Center's stroke support group, Pope, 73, found his footing, eventually taking over the group in 2010.
Home Instead recognized Pope on Wednesday as its Pennsylvania Senior Hero, winning an online voting contest after he was nominated as part of the group's annual “Salute to Senior Service,” which honors volunteers 65 and older.
Pope will now be among the candidates for the Home Instead's National Senior Hero award, which will be determined by a panel of senior care experts.
Pope said the stroke support group he now leads “gives me a reason to get up in the morning — it's my calling.”
The Home Instead National Senior Hero will be announced at the end of June.
Home Instead is a provider of nonmedical, in-home care services for senior citizens. The company has local offices in Monroeville and Oakmont.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.