Leadership roles shift as result of Pittsburgh police union rules
Pittsburgh police Acting Chief Regina McDonald said Wednesday she is moving officers into temporary leadership positions in the bureau.
Zone 6 Cmdr. Scott Schubert will become acting commander of the major crimes unit, and Lt. Robert Roth, who oversees narcotics, will become acting commander of narcotics and vice, McDonald said. The changes will take effect Monday.
The two will replace Lts. Kevin Kraus and Daniel Herrmann, who will return to their previous positions in major crimes. McDonald said the moves are necessary because union rules prohibit the lieutenants from serving as acting commanders for longer than 70 days.
She assigned Herrmann to head the narcotics and vice unit in March after transferring squad Cmdr. Cheryl Doubt to the Central Records and Reports Unit.
Kraus became acting commander of major crimes when McDonald named major crimes Cmdr. Thomas Stangrecki to succeed her as assistant chief of administration.
McDonald became acting chief when Mayor Luke Ravenstahl forced Nate Harper to resign as police chief on Feb. 20 in response to a federal investigation into police spending. A grand jury indicted Harper in March.
Prosecutors said he directed at least $70,628 into accounts he opened at the Greater Pittsburgh Police Federal Credit Union and spent at least $31,986 on meals and drinks, gifts, a TV and other personal items. The money came from businesses that hire off-duty officers.
Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.