Trail's last link opens to connect to Great Allegheny Passage in Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania has earmarked $2 million to construct a path along the Mon Wharf that will establish a traffic-free link between Smithfield Street and Point State Park for the Great Allegheny Passage, officials said on Saturday.
Matt Greene, manager of Point State Park, made the announcement during a ceremony Saturday to dedicate the final link of the 150-mile trail, which stretches from Pittsburgh to Cumberland, Md.
He called the expenditure an “investment.” Officials are hopeful the final link of the trail will spur tourism and business opportunities.
About 1,000 bikers rode the final 6.5-mile link Saturday from Homestead to Point State Park for a ceremony to mark the official opening.
Paul Wiegman spent the past three days biking to Pittsburgh from northern Maryland along the passage.
“It's was a wonderful trip filled with breathtaking scenery that takes you over railroad bridges above the water and through old rail tunnels, everyone should do it,” said Wiegman, 70, of Confluence in Somerset County.
Once in Cumberland, users of the passage can pick up the C&O Canal Towpath that goes to Washington to start a 334.5-mile route between Pittsburgh and Washington.
Trail use during the past 25 years has grown to about 800,000 people annually, according to Linda McKenna Boxx, executive director of the Allegheny Trail Alliance.
Ken Medved, 57, of McKeesport, who has been using parts of the trail since 1990 urged people to “get out and experience it.”
“You don't have to be in shape — you can ride anywhere at any time and feel safe,” he said, noting that the trail does not have any steep hills. “It's a fantastic way to enjoy the beautiful scenery and a little bit of history.”
Tony LaRussa is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7987.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.