Attention sought for state's unpaved roads
Janice Held tries to avoid driving on the unpaved lower end of Manor Drive in Armstrong County's Manor Township.
“It has ruts that you have to straddle,” said Held, 65, who lives on the paved portion of Manor Drive.
The unpaved section, near Nunamaker Hill Road, is one of 14,400 sites across Pennsylvania where dirt and gravel roads are in such poor shape that they threaten nearby streams and vehicles using the roads, according to the Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts.
For 16 years, the state has doled out $5 million annually to combat the problem. The money improved conditions at about 2,400 sites, the association said.
State leaders hope to pass legislation on Sunday to provide an additional $2 billion a year or more for transportation needs across the state. The multibillion-dollar debate in Harrisburg over transportation funding has focused largely on urban highways, bridges and transit systems. A proposed sevenfold increase in funding for the state's dirt and gravel road maintenance program, to $35 million annually, has gained little attention.
Yet work on dirt and gravel roads is critically important, said Robert B. Maiden, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts.
“Sediment pollution from dirt and gravel roads is a major problem. It kills stream or water quality, kills aquatic life and drives up costs for wastewater treatment plants,” Maiden said.
Road washouts that result in closures can lead to lengthy detours. Such detours and poor road conditions can harm rural businesses, including farms, Maiden said.
“It's a quality-of-life issue,” Maiden said.
Maiden said funding covers work on about 200 sites a year. County conservation districts distribute money to municipalities for work ranging from drainage improvements to road repairs.
Gregg Smith, the Armstrong County Conservation District's dirt and gravel road specialist, said, “Because the funding is so limited, municipalities can only do a small amount of work at a time. Work is usually done in phases over multiple years.”
The Armstrong County district is spending a combined $142,000 on 14 projects this year. All focus on drainage improvements that will divert stormwater from unpaved roads to prevent runoff from further eroding roads and carrying sediment from them into nearby streams. Road improvements would be done in future years, Smith said.
Road work can eat up money quickly. David R. Rupert, the Armstrong County Conservation District's manager, said it costs an average of $80,000 to surface one mile of unpaved road with aggregate materials — more than half of the grant money his district received this year from the state.
In Washington County, workers completed drainage work and road repairs last year on Oakleaf Road in Hopewell.
“It was barely passable with a Jeep and sediment from the road drained right into the backwaters of a county park that led to a nice fishing lake. It contributed tons and tons of sediment into that over the years,” said Matt Golden, Washington County Conservation District's erosion control technician.
Since 1997, Washington County municipalities have completed work along 26 miles of unpaved roads, but potential work is needed along another 100 miles, Golden said. Two projects totaling $89,000 are being done this year in West Pike Run and West Bethlehem townships.
Armstrong County gets more state funding because it has more unpaved roads.
Rupert said the district has a $450,000 backlog of projects that are waiting for funding.
“The increased funding could allow us to eliminate that backlog, but it definitely would not solve all of our problems,” Rupert said.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medical examiner emphatic: Klein died as a result of cyanide poisoning
- Homewood welcomes nonprofit Animal Rescue League’s new shelter, clinic
- Corbett, Wolf resort to sticks, stones to attract attention
- Defense witness testifies on video, absent jurors, of cyanide alternatives
- 3 named to new Pittsburgh land bank group
- Movie studio owner building in McKees Rocks is $540K in red
- Ferrante defense questions recordkeeping of lab that tested cyanide
- Ferrante suicide letter says he did not kill wife
- Police charge 18-year-old Penn Hills man in East Liberty shooting
- Warrant issued for North Side teen in Penn Hills shooting
- Newsmaker: Matthew Zupetic