Charitable giving rises across country, Allegheny County
Charitable giving rose 3.5 percent to $316.2 billion last year, mirroring the modest improvement in the economy, according to the 2013 Giving USA Report on Philanthropy.
Giving increased nearly $10.7 billion from the nearly $305.5 billion raised in 2011. The report was compiled by the Giving USA Foundation and its research partner, the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
The Pittsburgh Foundation surpassed the national average by raising $65 million in 2012, an increase of 8 percent over the previous year and its third consecutive fundraising record. Foundation officials attributed it to strengthened partnerships with the region's professional advisers, estate trust attorneys and accountants.
The United Way of Allegheny County also collected a record $33.2 million in 2012 — a 2.7 percent increase over the previous year's $32.3 million. The total has increased the past three years, the agency said.
The national report found that charitable giving by individuals rose by 3.9 percent to $228.9 billion; corporations gave 12.2 percent more, nearly $18.2 billion; and foundations gave 4.4 percent more, $45.7 billion.
Analysts noted that income, wealth and a sense of financial security drive individual giving. The $223 million given for Hurricane Sandy relief helped fuel contributions to human services.
Bill Zlatos is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7828 firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.