Ukrainian parliament members tour region to learn more about shale drilling
A delegation of Ukrainian parliament members toured the area on Monday to learn more about shale drilling for natural gas.
U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, invited the contingent to survey local industry sites and welcomed them with a reception in the St. Peter and St. Paul Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Carnegie.
Ukrainian Parliament member Sergey Klyuiev said the delegation hopes to find answers to questions about the drilling industry.
“We want to hold discussions about environmental problems and learn about technology problems,” Klyuiev said. “We are very concerned about energy.”
Murphy said the group wants to “see what they're in for” with planned gas production projects in their country. “They don't want to maintain dependence on Russia, and the Ukraine is blessed with its own shale,” he said. “They want to make sure to develop their industry in their own, safe way.”
Ukraine recently signed a $10 billion gas production agreement with Shell and is in negotiations with Chevron to begin a second drilling project.
This was the group's second visit to Southwestern Pennsylvania. They met with Murphy at the beginning of May and arranged the visit.
The group of nine was taken on a tour of Southpointe by Range Resources Corp. representatives. They also met with Murphy and other officials dealing with the drilling industry to ask question about the process.
“They asked some tough questions,” Murphy said. “They came to us with environmental concerns and water concerns.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.