Duquesne University scholarship in honor of beloved nurse reaches half its goal
Linda Peterson's lifelong commitment to helping others continues after her death.
Family, friends and coworkers have established a scholarship in her name at the Duquesne University School of Nursing and have crossed the halfway mark in their goal to raise $50,000 in the months after Peterson's death in November.
Peterson, 69, of South Park pioneered the volunteer program at Bethany Hospice in Green Tree and was its first volunteer coordinator. She also organized and coordinated a group of volunteers at First Bethel United Methodist Church that visited shut-ins.
“She was our fourth employee at startup,” said Diane Mead, founder and CEO of Bethany Hospice. “She just jumped on board.”
That was her nature, said Max Peterson, her husband of nearly 50 years.
“She would just go and do,” he said.
The Bethany Hospice/Linda L. Peterson Endowed Scholarship at the Duquesne University School of Nursing will help educate future healthcare workers, enabling them to continue her mission of volunteerism and selfless service to others, the hospice said.
The fundraising so far has been all word-of-mouth, a testament to Peterson's esteem in the community and the network of people she touched, her husband said.
Linda Peterson, who died of Sjogren's syndrome, an inflammatory disease that can affect many parts of the body, organized programs such as music therapy and instituted pet therapy visits at Bethany.
Craig Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5646 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.