Green Tree man wanted for arson at bar
A Green Tree man tried to burn down a borough bar on Saturday morning with a homemade firebomb after a fight with his girlfriend, Allegheny County police said.
Police have an arrest warrant for Daniel Crowe, 47, who had not been taken into custody as of that afternoon, on charges of arson, risking a catastrophe, reckless endangerment and criminal mischief.
According to an Allegheny County police report, Crowe and girlfriend Mary Smith argued inside Manny's Rook Street Cafe on Hawthorne Avenue shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday. At one point, Crowe threw an object at Smith.
Bartender Susan Cupp confronted Crowe, who shoved her, knocking her backwards, police wrote. Several of the seven people inside the bar then threw Crowe out of the bar.
Within a few minutes, police said, patrons heard a loud bang at the front door, and smoke billowed into the bar. Flames damaged the door, and police said a car belonging to one customer was damaged. No injuries were reported.
Police said they found evidence that Crowe fashioned a firebomb using a glass container filled with an accelerant and a piece of a T-shirt.
Police said they smelled gasoline, and the T-shirt smelled like citronella, or tiki torch fluid.
When police went to Crowe's residence, about an eight-minute walk from the bar, they said they found an open bottle of tiki torch fuel on the porch, and some of it was spilled on the porch.
An Allegheny County fire marshal ruled the fire an arson. Police did not list a dollar amount on the damage to the bar.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.