Bald eagle makes its first flight at 11 weeks
The first bald eagle believed to be born in Pittsburgh in more than 200 years took its first flight from the nest area in the Hays section this weekend, according to watchers and a local scientist.
“The fact that the eagle has survived to be 11 weeks old and is capable of flying on its own — it's a big corner for it to turn in terms of survival,” said Bob Mulvihill, an ornithologist for the National Aviary on the North Side.
About half of the nest departures for bald eagles are not successful, he said.
And there was concern about the new eaglet.
For the past three weeks, the eaglet has been living in a dense tangle of vines about 15 feet below the nest, which is believed to have partially collapsed, or at least slid.
Nonetheless, both parent eagles continued to bring fish and small animals to their youngster.
Last week, the young bird hadn't been seen in four days, and local watchers were afraid that something bad had happened to it.
But on Saturday, the eaglet made an appearance and took its first flight, much to the relief of area residents and scientists who have been watching the eagle family since the spring.
According to Mulvihill, the Hays eagles won't be tethered to the nest, as the free-flying eaglet is expected to soon follow its parents when they go hunting.
As a group, the eagle family is likely to leave the nest area by mid-August, when other eagles start to migrate. The adult birds are expected to return to the Hays nest site in late January and February.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.