Point Park applies to demolish historic sites
Point Park University has applied for permits to demolish three historic buildings on Forbes Avenue, Downtown, city planners said Tuesday.
The buildings, including the former Honus Wagner Co. sporting goods store, would be torn down to make way for a new Pittsburgh Playhouse, according to the Planning Commission.
The university plans a six-story performance and teaching venue at 320, 322 and 330 Forbes, which it describes in its spring issue of The Point magazine as world-class space for “everything from classical to unconventional productions.”
The project includes large windows facing the street that would let passers-by look into the theater. When the building is finished, Point Park would move the Playhouse from its location in Oakland.
Mariann K. Geyer, the university's vice president for external affairs, confirmed the project includes demolition but declined to provide details before a Planning Commission meeting.
“We're working on our presentation, and we'll have all those details available at the Planning Commission meeting next week,” she said.
The building at 320 Forbes, which housed the sporting goods store, was built as the Royal Restaurant around 1910, according to Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation. Its neighbor at 322 Forbes was built in 1911 and housed multiple tenants, including a first-floor restaurant and second-floor pool hall.
Harris Amusement Co. once occupied 330 Forbes, built around 1915.
Bob Bauder is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.