Police: Boy given drug-tainted orange
A Homewood man is accused of giving a little boy an orange on Thursday that police believe may be tainted with cocaine or crack cocaine.
Delbert Pate, 44, is charged with endangering the welfare of a child, drug violations and related crimes for the incident that occurred while he was talking to a group of young people on his porch on Kelly Street, said city police Sgt. Michael Pilyih. The 8-year-old boy did not eat the orange and was not harmed, Pilyih said.
The boy, who lives across the street, came over to Pate's porch where other young people had gathered, Pilyih said. For some unknown reason, the sergeant said, Pate gave the child a plastic grocery bag with an orange inside, Pilyih said. The orange, which had several knife slices in it, was lying in the bag, which also had a powdery substance that police believe might be cocaine or crack cocaine, Pilyih said.
The boy gave the bag to his sister who called police.
Police were forced to use pepper spray to detain Pate, who refused to come out of his house, Pilyih said. Pate, who was wearing an ankle bracelet, was taken to a hospital for treatment. He will be arraigned after being discharged, the sergeant said.
It was not immediately clear why Pate was wearing the ankle bracelet, Pilyih said. The substance will be analyzed to determine what it is, he said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.