Share This Page

Newsmaker: Kathryn Roeder

| Saturday, Aug. 3, 2013, 7:01 p.m.
Kathryn Roeder, a professor of statistics at Carnegie Mellon University, received the Janet L. Norwood Award for Outstanding Achievement by a Woman in the Statistical Sciences.

Notable: Roeder received the Janet L. Norwood Award for Outstanding Achievement by a Woman in the Statistical Sciences. Her current research focuses on statistical genomics and the genetic base of complex diseases with an emphasis on autism. The award, named after the first female commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and a past president of the American Statistical Association, is given annually by the University of Alabama at Birmingham's School of Public Health.

Age: 54.

Residence: Shadyside.

Family: Husband, Bernie Devlin; daughter, Summer Devlin, 16.

Occupation: Professor of statistics at Carnegie Mellon University.

Background: Roeder, who joined the CMU faculty in 1994, spent a year living in the wilderness regions of the Pacific Northwest as a research assistant for the Department of Wildlife Resources. She spent six years on the statistics faculty at Yale University.

Education: Ph.D. in Statistics from Pennsylvania State University, 1988; Bachelor of Science in Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, 1982.

Quote: “As a grad student I met only one successful woman in statistics, and this was a very encouraging experience for me. I am thrilled to have this award and I hope that I can be a positive influence to young women in the field.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.