Pipe fixes touted as solution to Banksville flood woes
Repairs around a collapsed pipe along Banksville Road should prevent flooding and road closures, a PennDOT official said.
PennDOT crews continued working on Thursday to remove the collapsed portion of the privately owned pipe and dig a ditch between the remaining pipe and PennDOT's stormwater system, said Steve Cowan, an agency spokesman.
Crews will line the ditch with rocks and build a barrier between the ditch and Banksville Road.
Cowan expected work will be complete by the weekend, when showers are predicted to return.
“We anticipate the fix will work,” Cowan said. “But with a pipe failure in the past, we're not sure if it will fail again upstream.”
The pipe lies on private property, and it is the owner's responsibility to fix it, Cowan said.
PennDOT officials met Wednesday with Ahan Hospitality, the owner of the property where the pipe failed, but did not reach an agreement to fix the problem, Cowan said. If the owner refuses to fix the pipe, the state can do it and bill the owner.
Ahan Hospitality did not return calls for comment.
Flooding closed Banksville Road at Crane Avenue twice during heavy rain this week and on July 10. About 25,000 commuters use Banksville Road each day, records show.
PennDOT acknowledged it knew the collapsed pipe and blocked stormwater culvert caused Banksville Road to flood after the July 10 storm but did not try to remedy the problem until Wednesday.
Aaron Aupperlee is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7986 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.