ShareThis Page

Cleared of murder, ex-inmate from Hazelwood finds ties with loved ones

| Monday, Aug. 26, 2013, 12:09 a.m.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Terrell Johnson, 38, of Hazelwood was released from prison in September after serving 18 years for murder when a second jury acquitted him. His nonprofit, PoorLaw, helped to clean up Blair Street playground.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Terrell Johnson, 38, of Hazelwood helps load landscaping equipment after cleaning up a playground with his nonprofit, PoorLaw, workforce development program. A jury in September freed Johnson from prison after 18 years.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Kenneth Robinson, 52, of Hazelwood came forth as a witness in Terrell Johnson's murder retrial, leading to Johnson's release from prison in September. Johnson, 38, of Hazelwood served 18 years.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Terrell Johnson, 38, of Hazelwood was released from prison in September after 18 years when prosecutors retried him for a murder. A jury acquitted him.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Terrell Johnson, 38, married Saundra Cole, 48, three years into his 18-year prison term. A jury acquitted him in a murder retrial and he was released in September.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Terrell Johnson, 38, and wife Saundra Cole, 48, outside their Hazelwood home.

Terrell Johnson recently started sleeping again.

A year ago, when he left prison, he would stay up all night cleaning or rearranging furniture, trying to keep busy to avoid falling asleep.

“I didn't want to wake up and realize I was dreaming and that I was still there,” said Johnson, 38, of Hazelwood.

Speaking publicly about his case for the first time, Johnson says he grew up behind the metal bars and concrete walls of the Greene County penitentiary, where a jury sent him in 1995 for the gangland-style murder of Verna Robinson, 20, of Hazelwood.

His release occurred in September when a second jury found him not guilty. He told the Tribune-Review he doesn't know what happened to Robinson that night and that he was at a friend's house.

“I couldn't believe justice turned around like that, but God gives you the power to go on,” said Barbara Robinson, 71, who lives on Almeda Street near where her daughter died.

She believes Johnson was involved in the murder: “Terrell knows. ... I'm not saying he was the one who pulled the trigger, but if he didn't, why didn't he say who did?”

Although no one tracks how many prisoners gain release with retrials, authorities said Johnson's term was among the longest in Allegheny County.

A witness came forward with information after 13 years, and prosecutors retried the case five years after that.

“The narrative generally stops when a judge orders a release or a new trial,” said Dwight L. Aarons, a law professor at the University of Tennessee who specializes in wrongful convictions. “This one is a little different. After the order of a new trial, the prosecutors went forward with a second trial and used the same evidence.”

Based on testimony from Evelyn “Dolly” McBryde of Hazelwood, police charged Johnson and three other men with the July 22, 1994, murder of Robinson, a witness to a drive-by shooting who once accused Johnson of beating her up over a $100 drug debt.

McBryde talked to police when she was caught shoplifting. She testified in 1995 that she heard a shot and saw the men surround Robinson on the street. One man shot her twice in the head, she said.

Johnson and two friends testified he was instead at a house, but jurors convicted him of first-degree murder. He drew a life sentence. In separate trials, one of the other men was acquitted of murder but convicted of conspiracy; the other was acquitted of all charges.

At Johnson's retrial, witness Kenneth Robinson — unrelated to the victim — testified that McBryde could not have witnessed the shooting because she was with him when it happened.

Johnson said he chose to be retried rather than accept a deal the district attorney's office offered, in which he would get credit for time served if he pleaded guilty.

“I wasn't going to plead guilty to something I didn't do,” he said.

Neither the prosecutor's office nor trial Judge Donald Machen would comment about the case.

The detective in the case could not be reached.

Johnson's attorney, Turahn Jenkins, said congratulatory messages filled his voicemail after the verdict. Jenkins now is on staff with the county public defender's office.

Johnson said he has spent 11 months renewing relationships with his family.

“It's been very challenging,” said his wife, Saundra Cole, 48, whom he married three years into his prison term. “Even though it's been 18 years of visits and telephone calls, it wasn't really like I never allowed myself to believe he was in jail. … He was always here emotionally and spiritually, just not physically.”

Johnson and Cole run a nonprofit, PoorLaw, out of their home. Between them, they are parents of nine children. Finding his place within the family has been complicated, Johnson said.

“I'm still just trying to get to know everybody. I watched them grow up in the visiting room,” he said.

Cases like Johnson's demonstrate the need to ensure accurate eyewitnesses, said Brandon Garrett, a University of Virginia School of Law professor who wrote a book about false prosecutions.

“You'd hope that cases like this would encourage the push for the adoption of more accurate lineup procedures,” Garrett said.

Johnson writes to some of the men imprisoned with him and sometimes talks with defendants about their rights.

He recalls feeling alone in prison, staring at photographs of his family.

“I used to look at this house in pictures,” he said. “Now I'm in the picture.”

Adam Brandolph is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.