Longtime officer mentored others
Edward A. Kearns spent much of his life as a Pittsburgh policeman trying to make things better for fellow officers and mentoring those who followed in their footsteps.
Mr. Kearns, 86, of Whitehall, who served as president of Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, Fraternal Order of Police, from 1974-78, died on Sunday. He was a city police officer from 1956 until his retirement as a sergeant in 1981, family members said.
“He was dedicated to the FOP,” said a daughter, Kimberly Reitmeyer. “He was dedicated to making the life of a police officer better and dedicated to making the police force better. He was a mentor to many of the FOP presidents who came after him.
Reitmeyer said her father fought to have the city pay for continuing education for officers.
“He wanted police officers to be better educated. He believed that the more you knew the criminal justice system and the law, the better officer you would be,” she said.
One of his major accomplishments was getting three-hour guaranteed paid court overtime for officers who had to be in court when they were not working.
“Before that, you would work all night and then spend six hours in court and all you would get was a $5 witness fee,” said Allegheny County Sheriff William P. Mullen, a 37-year Pittsburgh police veteran before joining the sheriff's department. “He was a bright guy with a lot of new ideas.”
Mr. Kearns is survived by his wife, Marlene Stobbe Kearns; another daughter, Karen Boyle; and two sons, Edward Kearns Jr. and Jeffrey Kearns.
Visitation will be from 5 to 8 p.m. Tuesday and Wednesday in the John F. Slater Funeral Home Inc., Brownsville Road, Brentwood. Funeral services will be Thursday morning.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.