Judge to decide Monday what to do with assets of doctor charged with homicide
An Allegheny County judge on Monday will determine what to do with the frozen financial assets of a University of Pittsburgh medical researcher accused of poisoning his wife with cyanide.
Robert Ferrante, 64, of Schenley Farms is charged with homicide in connection with the death of his wife, Autumn Marie Klein, 41. The UPMC neurologist died on April 20.
The asset hearing is scheduled before Common Pleas Judge David R. Cashman.
A court order on July 25 froze Ferrante's assets at 15 banks to ensure he can pay restitution if he's convicted.
Attorney Bill Difenderfer entered a not guilty plea on Ferrante's behalf at an arraignment on Tuesday.
Investigators allege Ferrante bought cyanide with a Pitt credit card and had it shipped overnight to his laboratory. Two days later, paramedics found Klein unresponsive on the kitchen floor of the couple's home. She died in UPMC Presbyterian.
A custody hearing for the couple's daughter, 6, was postponed with no date set. Klein's parents, Bill and Lois Klein of Towson, Md., will temporarily retain custody.
Adam Brandolph is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.