ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Nathan Michaux

| Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013, 11:36 p.m.
Nathan Michaux, 22, of Brighton Twp., Beaver County, who is the Newsmaker scheduled for Thursday, Aug. 15. Michaux is among 15 people from across the country to win the 2013 Gilder Lehrman History Scholar Award, which “recognizes outstanding graduating college seniors who have demonstrated academic and extracurricular excellence in American history or American studies.”

Noteworthy: Michaux, this year's valedictorian at Washington & Jefferson College, is among 15 people to win the 2013 Gilder Lehrman History Scholar Award. The award “recognizes outstanding graduating college seniors who have demonstrated academic and extracurricular excellence in American history or American studies,” according to the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History in New York City. Winners spent a week at the institute this summer.

Age: 22

Residence: Brighton, Beaver County

Family: Parents, Tim and Lisa Michaux; three brothers, Paul, 20; Gabe, 24; and Tim, 27.

Background: Michaux was a member of the Phi Beta Kappa chapter at Washington & Jefferson, the Student Christian Association and the history club.

Education: Michaux earned a bachelor of arts degree in history this spring from Washington & Jefferson. He plans to study law at the College of William & Mary College in Williamsburg, Va.

Quote: “I was a little bit surprised to win this award because the students who usually get picked are from larger schools. It was really great to get together with like-minded people, and the experience gave me a greater realization that the study of American history is still relevant.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.