Share This Page

Newsmaker: Zachary Patton

| Friday, Aug. 16, 2013, 10:58 p.m.
The University of Pittsburgh’s Outside the Classroom Curriculum awarded senior Zachary Patton a $1,500 grant to continue his work with Courthouse Kids, a nonprofit program inspiring youth civic engagement.

Noteworthy: The University of Pittsburgh's Outside the Classroom Curriculum awarded Patton, a senior at Pitt, a $1,500 grant to continue his work with Courthouse Kids. Courthouse Kids uses takes students on an interactive tour of the Armstrong County's “haunted” jail, invites them to interact with local elected officials, and teaches them about the legal process. Courthouse Kids, which is staffed by volunteers, is funded by donations from local businesses, the Armstrong County District Attorney's Office and the University of Pittsburgh.

Age: 21

Residence: Kittanning

Family: Parents, Jacky and William Patton; sisters Aubrey, Lacey and Casey.

Occupation: Senior at the University of Pittsburgh majoring in philosphy and communication and rhetoric.

Background: President of the Interfraternity Council at Pitt, a member of the Out of the Classroom Curriculum Honorary Society and past vice president of Sigma Chi International Fraternity. Also interned with Armstrong County District Attorney Scott Andreassi and state Sen. Don White.

Quote: “I think it is a special thing that the university is recognizing that I'm helping students to allow them to pursue their goals that they otherwise would not be able to pursue.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.